Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 12 (2024)</span>Volume 12 (2024)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 11 (2023)</span>Volume 11 (2023)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 10 (2022)</span>Volume 10 (2022)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 9 (2021)</span>Volume 9 (2021)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 8 (2020)</span>Volume 8 (2020)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 7 (2019)</span>Volume 7 (2019)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 6 (2018)</span>Volume 6 (2018)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 5 (2017)</span>Volume 5 (2017)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 4 (2016)</span>Volume 4 (2016)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 3 (2015)</span>Volume 3 (2015)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 2 (2014)</span>Volume 2 (2014)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 1 (2013)</span>Volume 1 (2013)
Journal of Business and Management Sciences. 2022, 10(1), 30-38
DOI: 10.12691/JBMS-10-1-4
Original Research

Corporate Governance against Systematic Risk during COVID-19 -- Empirical Findings Based on fs/QCA

Chih-Yi Hsiao1, , Qing-Ru Yan1, Di Yang1 and Rui-Xiong Zhu1

1Xiamen University Tan Kah Kee College, Zhangzhou, China

Pub. Date: January 11, 2022

Cite this paper

Chih-Yi Hsiao, Qing-Ru Yan, Di Yang and Rui-Xiong Zhu. Corporate Governance against Systematic Risk during COVID-19 -- Empirical Findings Based on fs/QCA. Journal of Business and Management Sciences. 2022; 10(1):30-38. doi: 10.12691/JBMS-10-1-4

Abstract

Based on samples of listed Chinese companies, we use fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fs/QCA) to explore the relationship between corporate governance and systematic risk during COVID-19. Our findings are as follows: 1) Good corporate governance can slash the impact of systematic risk, and state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are more resistant to systematic risk. 2) Enterprises with both good board and ownership structures can reduce systematic risk by enhancing the benign interaction with stakeholders through information disclosure, a deed that will, on the contrary, increase business risks. 3) If the members of the board have the concept of governance and related professional background, there is no need to increase the proportion of independent directors. 4) The higher the shareholding ratio of the top ten shareholders or the more dispersed overall equity of a company, the more significantly positive effect on stabilizing its operation; a poorly operated enterprise may diminish its operation risks by increasing the proportion of institutional shareholders and inviting them to participate in the company’s operation. Based on the above findings, we put forward corresponding suggestions for enterprises and regulators.

Keywords

corporate governance, systematic risk, fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Copyright

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]  Huang, H.-H. (2019). Audit committees and systematic risk: Evidence from Taiwan’s regulatory change. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 47, 477-491.
 
[2]  Sharp, W. (1964). Capital Asset prices: A Theory of Capital Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk. Journal of Finance. 19, 425-442.
 
[3]  Blume, M. E. (1971). On the Assessment of Risk. The Journal of Finance. 45(3), 44-66.
 
[4]  Cohen, K., Hawawini, G., Mayer, S. and Schwartz, et al. (1983). Friction in the Trading Process and the Estimation of systematic Risk. The Journal of Finance. 18(4), 62-74.
 
[5]  Rosenberg, B. W. and McKibben (1973). The Prediction of Systemematic and Specific Risk in Common Stocks. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. March, 317-333.
 
[6]  Scholes, W. (1977). Estimating Betas from Nonsynchronous Data. Journal of Financial Economics. 7(5), 9-327.
 
[7]  Vasicek, O. A. (1973). A Note on Using Cross-Sectional Information in Bayesian Estimation of Security Betas. The Journal of Finance. 10, 423-434.
 
[8]  Huang, B. Y. and Liu, W. L. (2008). Empirical study on the relationship between corporate governance and systematic risk: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on E-Risk Management (ICERM 2008), 248-255.
 
[9]  Prasetyo, A.H. (2011). Corporate Governance and systematic Risk, Evidence from Indonesia Listed Company. Economics and Finance Research (ICEFR 2011), 4, 443-449.
 
[10]  Huang, B. X., He, G. Z. and Peng, H. F. (2020). Investment Loan Linkage, System Risk and Capital Pro Cyclical Effect. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law. 3, 88-96.
 
[11]  Yang, M.-z., Li, H.-h. and Liu, X. (2017). Earnings Persistence, Corporate Governance and Stock Price Crash Risk-Empirical Evidence from China’s Stock Market. Journal of Financial Research. 1, 27-39.
 
[12]  Liu, Z. and Huang, Q. (2019). Market competition and stock collapse risk. International Conference on Economic Management and Model Engineering (ICEMME 2019), 37-41.
 
[13]  Zhang, Y. and Song, B. (2020). Controlling Shareholders' Equity Pledge, Corporate Governance and Financial Risk. Finance and Accounting Monthly. 20, 152-160.
 
[14]  Li, M., Wu, X. S., Fang, F. and Zhu. X (2021). Institutional Investors' Shareholding and Stock Price Collapse Risk: From the Perspective of Internal and External Governance, Communication of Finance and Accounting, 21, 53-57.
 
[15]  Amewu, G. and Alagidede, P. (2019). Executive compensation and firm risk after successful mergers and acquisitions in Africa, Managerial and Decision Economics, 40(6), 672-703.
 
[16]  Chaivisuttangkun, S. and Jiraporn, P. (2021). The effect of co-opted directors on firm risk during a stressful time: Evidence from the financial crisis. Finance Research Letters, 39(March), 101538.
 
[17]  Miranda, K. F., Melo, J. R.D. A. and Martins, O. S. (2021). Firms’ legitimation through corporate governance and its association with risk and return in Brazil, RAUSP Management Journal, 56(1), 55-70.
 
[18]  Zhu, Q., Chen. X. -h. and Hou, Y. (2019). The impact of equity-based executive compensation on risk-taking behavior: Evidence from Chinese listed companies], Journal of Industrial Engineering/Engineering Management, 33(3), 24-34.
 
[19]  CHEN, Z. and FANG, H. (2016). Corporate Tax Avoidance Behavior and Investors' systematic Risk Assessment. Journal of Management Science, 29(5), 134-146.
 
[20]  Zhou, T. T. (2013). Board governance, management ownership and lower end system risk -- An Empirical Analysis Based on simultaneous equation model. Modern Management Science, 01, 42-45.
 
[21]  Huang, B. and Li, Y. (2010). Empirical Study on the Relation between Corporate Governance and systematic Risk: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms. The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics, 31(2), 54-58.
 
[22]  Young, C.-S. and Wu, S.-J. (2009). The Determinants and Effects on Earnings Informativeness of Asset Impairments: The Role of Corporate Governance. International Journal of Accounting Studies. 48, 67-114.
 
[23]  Beasley, M. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 71 (October), 443-465.
 
[24]  Boyd, B. K. (1994). Board control and CEO compensation. Strategic management journal, 15(5), 335-344.
 
[25]  Xie, B., W. N. Davidson III, and P. J. DaDalt. (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: The role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance 9 (June): 295-316.
 
[26]  Jensen, M C., and W. Meckling. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(October), 305-360.
 
[27]  Cui, X. (2005). Turnover of Large Shareholders, Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance: Empirical Evidence from China Listed Companies. China Accounting Review, 3(1), 47-62.
 
[28]  Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The journal of finance, 52(2), 737-783.
 
[29]  Park, S.Y. and Kim, S.H. (2016). Determinants of systematic risk in the US Restaurant industry: A technical perspective. Tourism Economics. 22 (3), 621-628.
 
[30]  von Eije, H., Smid, P. and Suurmeijer, M. (2015). Development and Firm Risk. Korporativnye finansy (Корпоративные финансы), 3, 7-26.
 
[31]  Li, H. (2018). Residual state ownership and stock market integration: Evidence from Chinese partly-privatised firms. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 67, 100-112.
 
[32]  Wang, Z. B., Chiu, Y. H., Hsieh, J. C., Li, Y. and Hsiao, L.H. (2018). Performance appraisal for the operation and management of listed and OTC Taiwanese companies with DEA benchmarking models. Journal of The Asia Pacific Economy. 23(3), 447-464.
 
[33]  Ragin C. C. (1987). The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press.
 
[34]  Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-Set Social Science. University of Chicago Press Economics Books.