Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 12 (2024)</span>Volume 12 (2024)
Issue 2, Volume 12, 2024
Issue 1, Volume 12, 2024
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 11 (2023)</span>Volume 11 (2023)
Issue 6, Volume 11, 2023
Issue 5, Volume 11, 2023
Issue 4, Volume 11, 2023
Issue 3, Volume 11, 2023
Issue 2, Volume 11, 2023
Issue 1, Volume 11, 2023
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 10 (2022)</span>Volume 10 (2022)
Issue 4, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 3, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 2, Volume 10, 2022
Issue 1, Volume 10, 2022
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 9 (2021)</span>Volume 9 (2021)
Issue 4, Volume 9, 2021
Issue 3, Volume 9, 2021
Issue 2, Volume 9, 2021
Issue 1, Volume 9, 2021
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 8 (2020)</span>Volume 8 (2020)
Issue 3, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 2, Volume 8, 2020
Issue 1, Volume 8, 2020
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 7 (2019)</span>Volume 7 (2019)
Issue 3, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 2, Volume 7, 2019
Issue 1, Volume 7, 2019
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 6 (2018)</span>Volume 6 (2018)
Issue 4, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 3, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 2, Volume 6, 2018
Issue 1, Volume 6, 2018
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 5 (2017)</span>Volume 5 (2017)
Issue 4, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 3, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 2, Volume 5, 2017
Issue 1, Volume 5, 2017
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 4 (2016)</span>Volume 4 (2016)
Issue 6, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 5, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 4, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 3, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 2, Volume 4, 2016
Issue 1, Volume 4, 2016
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 3 (2015)</span>Volume 3 (2015)
Issue 5, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 4, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 3, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 2, Volume 3, 2015
Issue 1, Volume 3, 2015
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 2 (2014)</span>Volume 2 (2014)
Issue 6, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 5, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 3A, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 4, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 3, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 2, Volume 2, 2014
Issue 1, Volume 2, 2014
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 1 (2013)</span>Volume 1 (2013)
Issue 6, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 5, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 4, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 3, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 2, Volume 1, 2013
Issue 1, Volume 1, 2013
Journal of Business and Management Sciences. 2015, 3(1), 1-5
DOI: 10.12691/JBMS-3-1-1
Original Research

To Study the Relationship between Performance Appraisal and Employee Performance in Telecom Sector

Neeraj Kumari1,

1Department of Humanities & Management, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Manav Rachna International University, Faridabad, India

Pub. Date: April 02, 2015

Cite this paper

Neeraj Kumari. To Study the Relationship between Performance Appraisal and Employee Performance in Telecom Sector. Journal of Business and Management Sciences. 2015; 3(1):1-5. doi: 10.12691/JBMS-3-1-1

Abstract

The study aims at developing a strong impact of perceived fairness of performance appraisal on employee performance. It is a descriptive research. Data was collected from the respondents through a standardized questionnaire. The sample size consists of 80 employees from Vodafone and Tata Docomo. Analysis of data is done through quantitative method that is numerical figure. Instrument used for data analysis is SPSS. The analysis of responses was done by using correlation and regression analysis. Correlation analysis says that there exists a relationship between perceived fairness of performance appraisal and employee performance. In regression analysis, the nature of the relationship between the dependent and the independent variables was analyzed and the result was that there exists a significant impact of perceived fairness of performance appraisal on employee performance.

Keywords

appraisal system, expected performance, role and targets, self review, and training & development needs

Copyright

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]  Bernardin & Beatty, Self-appraisal based upon supervisory feedback, Personnel Psychology, 1984, Vol. 37 Issue 4, pp 667-685.
 
[2]  Brockner, Performance Evaluation in Work Settings. Annual Review Psychology, 2002, 49, pp 141-168.
 
[3]  Cobb & Frey, Does received Organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and perceived fairness of performance appraisal behavior Academy of Management Journal, 1996, Vol. 41. No.3, pp 351-371.
 
[4]  Coens & Jenkins, Toward Narrowing the Research- Practice Gap in Performance Appraisal. Personnel Psychology, 2000, 39, pp 335-345.
 
[5]  Karol, The Perception of the Employees toward the Outcomes and Detriments of Performance Appraisal System, Business & Economics Research Journal, 1996, Vol. 2 Issue 3, pp 87-108
 
[6]  Landy, Barnes & Murphy, Performance Perceptions of Organizational Citizenship Behaviours at Work: a Bi-Level Study among Managers and Employees. British Journal of Management, 1978, Vol. 16, pp 231-244.
 
[7]  Roberts & Reed, Appraisal Politics: Revisiting from Assessors' Perspective, Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers; 1996, Vol. 32 Issue 1, pp 75-87.