Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 12 (2024)</span>Volume 12 (2024)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 11 (2023)</span>Volume 11 (2023)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 10 (2022)</span>Volume 10 (2022)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 9 (2021)</span>Volume 9 (2021)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 8 (2020)</span>Volume 8 (2020)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 7 (2019)</span>Volume 7 (2019)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 6 (2018)</span>Volume 6 (2018)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 5 (2017)</span>Volume 5 (2017)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 4 (2016)</span>Volume 4 (2016)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 3 (2015)</span>Volume 3 (2015)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 2 (2014)</span>Volume 2 (2014)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 1 (2013)</span>Volume 1 (2013)
Journal of Business and Management Sciences. 2017, 5(3), 93-99
DOI: 10.12691/JBMS-5-3-4
Original Research

Exploring the Mediating Role of Training on the Relationship between Future Orientation and Context Performance

Jih-Hua Yang1, , Shih-Chieh Fang1 and Ching-Ying Huang1

1Department of Business Administration, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan

Pub. Date: October 28, 2017

Cite this paper

Jih-Hua Yang, Shih-Chieh Fang and Ching-Ying Huang. Exploring the Mediating Role of Training on the Relationship between Future Orientation and Context Performance. Journal of Business and Management Sciences. 2017; 5(3):93-99. doi: 10.12691/JBMS-5-3-4

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the mediating role of training (perceived trainer performance, PTP; perceived usefulness of training, PUT and perceived efficiency of training, PET) between future orientation and context performance. Questionnaire was the tool of collecting data from a sample of (210) pharmacists. The results of the study indicated that there is a positive effect of future orientation on context performance. Also, there is partial effect of the three mediator variables (perceived trainer performance, PTP; perceived usefulness of training, PUT and perceived efficiency of training, PET) on the relationship between independent and dependent variables.

Keywords

perceived trainer performance, perceived usefulness of training, perceived efficiency of training, future orientation, task performance

Copyright

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]  Nadler, Z., & Nadler, L. (2012). Designing training programs. Routledge.
 
[2]  Chaudron, D. (1996), Training Effectiveness - Don’t Overload the Horse, HR Focus, January, 10-11.
 
[3]  Gomez-Mejia, L.R., Balkin, D.B., and Cardy, R.L. (2004). Managing Human Resources, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
 
[4]  Mathieu, J.E., Tannenbaum, S.I., and Salas, E. (1992), Influence of Individual and Situational Characteristics on Measures of Training Effectiveness, The Academy of Management Journal, 35, 4, 828-847.
 
[5]  Abiodun, E. (1999). Human Resources management, an overview. Concept Publication, Shomolu, Lagos, 110-121.
 
[6]  Gilley, J. W., Eggland, S. A., & Gilley, A. M. (2002). Principles of human resource development. Basic Books.
 
[7]  Thang, N. N., Quang, T. & Buyens, D. (2010). The Relationship Between Training and Firm Performance: A Literature Review, Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 18(1), 28-45.
 
[8]  Meyer, J.P., and Allen, N.J. (1997), Commitment in the Workplace, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
 
[9]  Rhoades, L., and Eisenberger, R. (2002), Perceived Organizational Support: A Review of the Literature, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698-714.
 
[10]  Kidder, P.J., and Rouiller, J.Z. (1997), Evaluating the Success of a Large-scale Training Effort, National Productivity Review, Spring, 79-89.
 
[11]  Sande, Öystein. (1972). Future Oriented. Journal of Peace Research, 9, 271-278.
 
[12]  Bembenutty, H., Karabenick, S. A. (2003). Academic delay of gratification, future goals, and self-regulated learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational research Association, Chicago.
 
[13]  Husman J., & Lens J. (1999). The role of the future in student motivation. Educational Psychology, 34, 113-125.
 
[14]  Miller R. B., & Brickman S. J. (2004). A model of future-oriented motivation and self-regulation. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 9-33.
 
[15]  Gardner, D. G., Dunham, R. B., Cummings, L. L., & Pierce, J. L. (1987). Employee focus of attention and reactions to organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23, 351-370.
 
[16]  Pierce, J. L., Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., & Dunham, R. B. (1989). Organization-based self-esteem: Construct definition, operationalization, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 622-648.
 
[17]  Trommsdorff, g. (1983). Future orientation and socialization. International Journal of Psychology, 18, 381-406.
 
[18]  Fried, Y., & Slowik, L. H. (2004). Enriching goal-setting theory with time: An integrated approach. Academy of Management Review, 29, 404-422.
 
[19]  Gjesme T. (1983). On the concept of future time orientation: Considerations of some functions’ and measurements’ implications. International Journal of Psychology, 18, 443-461.
 
[20]  Shipp, A. J., Edwards, J.R., & Lambert, L. S. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110, 1-22.
 
[21]  Peters, R. S. (2010). Education and the Education of Teachers (International Library of the Philosophy of Education volume 18). Routledge.
 
[22]  Steiner, D.D., Dobbins, G.H., and Trahan, W.A. (1991). The Trainer-Trainee Interaction: An Attributional Model of Training, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 4, 271-286.
 
[23]  Morris, M. (1984). The Evaluation of Training, ICT, March/April, 9-16.
 
[24]  Warr, P., Allan, C., and Birdi, K. (1999). Predicting Three Levels of Training Outcome, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 351-375.
 
[25]  Warr, P., and Bunce, D. (1995). Trainee Characteristics and the Outcomes of Open Learning, Personnel Psychology, 48, 347-374.
 
[26]  Webster, J., and Martocchio, J.J. (1995). The Differential Effects of Software Training Previews on Training Outcomes, Journal of Management, 21, 4, 757-787.
 
[27]  Lee, S.H., and Pershing, J.A. (2002). Dimensions and Design Criteria for Developing Training Reactions, Human Resource Development International, 5, 2, 175-197.
 
[28]  Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
 
[29]  Motowidlo, S. J., & van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475-480.
 
[30]  Gjesme, T. (1979). Future time orientation as a function of achievement motives, ability, delay of gratification, and sex. The Journal of Psychology, 101, 173-188.
 
[31]  Giangreco, A., Sebastiano, A., & Peccei, R. (2009). Trainees' reactions to training: an analysis of the factors affecting overall satisfaction with training. The international journal of human resource management, 20(1), 96-111.