Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 12 (2024)</span>Volume 12 (2024)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 11 (2023)</span>Volume 11 (2023)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 10 (2022)</span>Volume 10 (2022)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 9 (2021)</span>Volume 9 (2021)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 8 (2020)</span>Volume 8 (2020)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 7 (2019)</span>Volume 7 (2019)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 6 (2018)</span>Volume 6 (2018)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 5 (2017)</span>Volume 5 (2017)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 4 (2016)</span>Volume 4 (2016)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 3 (2015)</span>Volume 3 (2015)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 2 (2014)</span>Volume 2 (2014)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 1 (2013)</span>Volume 1 (2013)
Journal of Business and Management Sciences. 2019, 7(2), 84-90
DOI: 10.12691/JBMS-7-2-4
Original Research

The Mediating Role of User Perception on the Relationship between Information Technology Integration and Performance of Selected Public Hospitals in Kenya

Stephen Muathe1, Stephen Titus Waithaka2 and Iloka Kenneth Malongo3,

1Department of Business Administration, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya

2Department of Computing & Technology, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya

3Department of Management Science, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya

Pub. Date: May 24, 2019

Cite this paper

Stephen Muathe, Stephen Titus Waithaka and Iloka Kenneth Malongo. The Mediating Role of User Perception on the Relationship between Information Technology Integration and Performance of Selected Public Hospitals in Kenya. Journal of Business and Management Sciences. 2019; 7(2):84-90. doi: 10.12691/JBMS-7-2-4

Abstract

Kenya’s health sector is faced by shortage of resources, inefficiencies and ineffectiveness that deters the achievement of residents' goals of excellent health, fairness, cost effectiveness, acceptance and sustainable development. Therefore, this study analyzed the mediating effect of User Perception on the relationship between Information Technology Integration and Performance of selected Public Hospitals in Kenya. The study was anchored on Technology Acceptance Model and Diffusion of Innovations Theory. The study was guided by the philosophy of positivism research. An explanatory and cross-sectional survey research design were utilized. The target population of the study included ninety-eight, public hospitals in Kenya which have integrated managed equipment services. Multi-stage sampling technique was used to select a sample size of 294 respondents. The study used primary data collected using self-administered semi-structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and multiple regression were used for data analysis. The study findings showed that user perception had a significant effect on the relationship between information technology integration and performance of public hospitals in Kenya. The study concluded that user perception mediated the relationship between information technology integration and performance. The study recommends that management of public hospitals should conduct awareness forums to enlighten users of the technologies and correct the misconceptions and wrong perceptions about technologies among the employees.

Keywords

information technology in Kenya, user perception, public hospitals, information technology integration

Copyright

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]  Kaseje D (2006) Health care in Africa: Challenges, Opportunities and an emerging model for improvement. Presented at The Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars. Retrieved May, 09, 2017.
 
[2]  Aluvanze, Hudson & Senaji, Thomas. (2017). Organisational Adaptability to Disruptive Technologies among Kenyan Commercial Banks. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development. 6.
 
[3]  Munduga, P. (2014). An analysis of the poor performance of state-owned enterprises in Africa. Http://www.academia.edu/8226631.
 
[4]  De Waal, A., & Tan Akaraborworn, C. (2013). Is the high-performance organization framework suitable for Thai organizations? Measuring Business Excellence, 17(4), 76-87.
 
[5]  Sheshinski, E. (2003). Privatization and its benefits: Theory and Evidence. CESifo Economic Studies, 49(3), 429-459.
 
[6]  Bourne, M., Neely, A., Mills, J., & Platts, K. (2003). Implementing performance measurement systems: a literature review. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 5(1), 1-24.
 
[7]  Al-Najjar, S. M., & Kalaf, K. H. (2012). Designing a balanced scorecard to measure a bank's performance: A case study. International journal of business administration, 3(4), 44.
 
[8]  Liang, C., & Yao, M. (2005). The Value-Relevance of Financial and Nonfinancial Information? Evidence from Taiwan’s Information Electronics Industry. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 24(2), 135-157.
 
[9]  Lusthaus, Charles*Adrien, Marie-Helene*Morgan, Peter. 2000. Integrating capacity development into project design and evaluation: approach and frameworks (English). Monitoring and evaluation working paper series; no. 5. Washington, D.C.
 
[10]  McLaughlin, J., & Jordan, G. B. (2010). Using Logic Models. In Joseph S. Wholey, Harry P. Hatry & Kathryn E. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of Practical Programme Evaluation (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
 
[11]  Njuguna, J. W. (2013). Strategic social marketing, operating environment and performance of community-based HIV and Aids organizations in Nairobi County, Kenya. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Nairobi, Kenya.
 
[12]  Marta, R. G. (2008). Evaluating the Organizational Performance and Social Impact of the Third Sector Organizations: A New Functional Realm for Non-profit Marketing. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference for the International society for Third Sector Research. JSTOR.
 
[13]  Silverman, R. M. (2008). The Influence of Nonprofit Networks on Local Affordable Housing Funding: Findings from a National Survey of Local Public Administrators. Urban Affairs Review. published online 17 April 2008.
 
[14]  Macharia, J., & Maroa, C. (2014, May). Health management information systems (HMIS) implementation characteristics that influence the quality of healthcare in private hospitals in Kenya. IST-Africa Conference Proceedings, 2014, 1-12. IEEE.
 
[15]  Park, J. Y., Im, K. S., & Kim, J. S. (2011). The role of IT human capability in the knowledge transfer process in IT outsourcing context. Information & Management, 48(1), 53-61.
 
[16]  Chong, S., & Pervan, G. (2007). Factors influencing the extent of deployment of electronic commerce for small-and medium sized enterprises. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), 5(1), 1-29.
 
[17]  Leng, G. S., Lada, S., Muhammad, M. Z., Ibrahim, A. A. H. A., & Amboala, T. (2011). An exploration of social networking sites (SNS) adoption in Malaysia using technology acceptance model (TAM), theory of planned behaviour (TPB) and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 16(2), 1.
 
[18]  Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
 
[19]  Osman, Z., Alwi, N. H. & Khan, B. N. (2016). A study of mediating effect of attitude on perceived ease of use and students intention to use online learning platform among online learning institutions in Malaysia.
 
[20]  Eristi, S. D., Kurt, A. A., & Dindar, M. (2012). Teachers' Views about Effective Use of Technology in Classrooms. Online Submission, 3(2), 30-41.
 
[21]  Lombardi, M. M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Educause learning initiative, 1(2007), 1-12.
 
[22]  Priyanka, S., & Kumar, A. (2013). Understanding the evolution of technology acceptance model. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, 1(6), 144-148.
 
[23]  Rogers Everett, M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York, 12.
 
[24]  Rogers, E.M. (2010) Diffusion of Innovations. 4th Edition, Simon and Schuster, New York.
 
[25]  Mourad, M. (2010). Students' adoption of an open access online education service: An exploratory study in an emerging higher education (HE) market. Online Information Review, 34(4), 604-617.
 
[26]  Chieochan, S., Hossain, E., & Diamond, J. (2010). Channel assignment schemes for infrastructure-based 802.11 WLANs: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 12(1), 124-136.
 
[27]  Mustapha, B. & Obid, S. N. B. S. (2015). Tax Service Quality: The Mediating Effect of Perceived Ease of Use of the Online Tax System. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 2-9.
 
[28]  Malik, M. S., & Sattar, H. H. (2017). The effect of technology perception of employees on organizational performance; in the public and private bank so of Pakistan. The Business & Management Review, 9(2), 284-291.
 
[29]  Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods. Business Students 4th edition Pearson Education Limited, England.
 
[30]  Republic of Kenya (2008): Vision 2030 Blueprint. Nairobi: Government Printer.
 
[31]  Muathe, SMA. (2010). The determinants of adoption of information and Communication technology by small and medium Enterprises within the health sector in Nairobi, Kenya. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Kenyatta University.
 
[32]  Mwithiga, L. T., Njihia, J. M., & Iraki, X. N. (2017). Information Technology (IT) Integration and Firm Performance. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 5(5), 802-823.
 
[33]  Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
 
[34]  MacKinnon, D. P., & Fairchild, A. J. (2009). Current directions in mediation analysis. Current directions in psychological science, 18(1), 16-20.
 
[35]  Rucker, D.D., Preacher, K.J., Tormala, Z.L., & Petty, R.E. (2011). Mediation Analysis in Social Psychology: Current Practices and New Recommendations.